- Nigeria’s salary structure has long been a subject of debate, with vast disparities between what different categories of workers, politicians, and professionals earn. The inequality in remuneration has far-reaching implications for the country, contributing to societal unrest, corruption, and a sense of injustice among the populace.
This article examines the current salary structures in Nigeria, highlights the detrimental effects of these disparities on society, and argues for a unified salary structure across all sectors.
Furthermore, it draws on examples from other countries that have adopted a more egalitarian approach to remuneration, offering lessons for Nigeria.
Nigeria operates a tiered salary structure, where different categories of workers, including politicians, professionals, judicial officers, military, and paramilitary personnel, are paid vastly different amounts. Politicians, particularly members of the National Assembly, are among the highest-paid in the country.
According to reports, a Nigerian senator earns over ₦13 million monthly in salaries and allowances, while the basic salary of a civil servant on Grade Level 8 is approximately ₦70,000 per month under the new minimum wage. This disparity is even more glaring when compared to the salaries of healthcare workers, teachers, and security personnel, who often earn meager amounts despite their critical roles in society.
The judiciary, military, and paramilitary forces also operate under different pay scales, with judges and high-ranking officers receiving significantly more than lower-ranking personnel. These disparities are not only unfair but also undermine the morale of workers, leading to inefficiency and corruption in the public service.
The damaging effects of disparate salary structures on society
The current salary structure in Nigeria has several damaging effects on society which include corruption and inefficiency. This is because the wide gap in salaries has fueled corruption, particularly among public servants and low-ranking officials who see bribes and kickbacks as necessary supplements to their inadequate incomes. This has led to inefficiency in the public service, as employees prioritize personal gain over public service.
Social Inequality: The disparity in earnings exacerbates social inequality, leading to a growing divide between the rich and the poor. This inequality breeds resentment and discontent among the populace, contributing to social unrest and a breakdown in trust between the government and the people.
Brain Drain: Highly skilled professionals, such as doctors, engineers, and academics, often seek opportunities abroad where they are better compensated. This brain drain deprives Nigeria of the talent needed for national development and hinders economic growth.
Moral Decay: The perception that political office is a quick route to wealth has led to a decline in the moral fabric of society, with many young people aspiring to political office not to serve but to enrich themselves.
Rationale for a Unified Salary Structure
Given the damaging effects of the current salary disparities, there is a strong case for unifying Nigeria’s salary structures. Placing all categories of workers, politicians, professionals, judicial officers, military, and paramilitary personnel on the same salary structure would promote equity and fairness, fostering a more cohesive and just society. Here are some reasons why this approach is justified:
Promotes Equality: A unified salary structure ensures that all workers are valued equally, regardless of their profession or position. This would reduce social inequality and promote a more balanced distribution of wealth.
Reduces Corruption: When all workers receive fair and adequate compensation, the incentive to engage in corrupt practices diminishes. This would lead to greater efficiency and transparency in public service.
Improves Morale and Productivity: A fair salary structure boosts the morale of workers, leading to increased productivity and a stronger commitment to public service. This would have positive ripple effects on national development.
Attracts and Retains Talent: A unified salary structure that offers competitive wages would attract and retain skilled professionals, reducing the brain drain and ensuring that Nigeria has the human resources needed for development.
Examples from Other Countries
Several countries have implemented more egalitarian salary structures, with positive results:
Norway: Norway operates a relatively flat salary structure, where the difference between the highest and lowest-paid employees is minimal. This has contributed to the country’s high levels of social equality, low corruption rates, and strong public trust in government institutions.
New Zealand: New Zealand has also adopted a more egalitarian approach to salaries, particularly within the public sector. The country’s emphasis on fair pay has resulted in a highly efficient public service, low levels of corruption, and a strong commitment to public welfare.
Singapore: While not entirely uniform, Singapore’s salary structure for public servants is designed to be competitive with the private sector, reducing the temptation for corruption and ensuring that public service is seen as an attractive career choice. This has contributed to the country’s reputation for efficiency and low corruption.
Conclusion
The disparities in Nigeria’s salary structures are not only unfair but also harmful to the country’s social fabric and development prospects. By adopting a unified salary structure, Nigeria can promote equality, reduce corruption, and improve the morale and productivity of its workforce.
Learning from countries like Norway, New Zealand, and Singapore, Nigeria can create a more just and prosperous society where all citizens have the opportunity to thrive. The time for reform is now, and the benefits of a fair and equitable salary structure cannot be overstated.
Dr James-Wisdom Abhulimen is Chairman, Nigerian Institute of Public Relations (NIPR), Edo State Chapter.